VASYL DAVYDENKOLIVE OUT LOUD
Русская редакцияРедакционный перевод этой страницы пока готовится; ниже показан англоязычный оригинал.

TRACE THE DECISION

Authority should leave a visible trail

Members should not have to guess how an important decision appeared. A democratic institution should be able to show who made it, what authority was used and who became responsible for carrying it out.

Explore related topics →
I

AUTHOR

Every decision has an author

“The union decided” is sometimes true. Sometimes it hides the answer.

The responsible body or office should be identifiable.

OPEN →
II

AUTHORITY

Show the source of the power

An important decision should be connectable to the constitutional or properly delegated authority that allowed it to be made.

OPEN →
III

RECORD

Record how collective decisions were made

Where a collegial body decides, the record should show the proposal, the result, relevant conflicts and responsibility for implementation.

OPEN →
IV

REASONS

Important power deserves an explanation

Not every routine act needs an essay. But decisions that seriously affect rights, money, mandates or institutions should be capable of being explained.

OPEN →
V

DISAGREEMENT

A minority view does not need to disappear

In bodies performing independent constitutional or adjudicative work, disagreement can matter.

A reasoned separate or dissenting opinion can make the institution more transparent without preventing the majority from deciding.

OPEN →
VI

RESPONSIBILITY

Authority and responsibility stay together

A person or body should not possess the power to decide while responsibility for the consequences is pushed somewhere else.

OPEN →